Physical Review B
covering condensed matter and materials physics
- Highlights
- Recent
- Accepted
- Collections
- Authors
- Referees
- Search
- Press
- About
- Editorial Team
Many-body order parameters for multipoles in solids
Byungmin Kang, Ken Shiozaki, and Gil Young Cho
Phys. Rev. B 100, 245134 – Published 20 December 2019
- Article
- References
- Citing Articles (100)
PDFHTMLExport Citation
- Abstract
- Authors
- See Also
- Article Text
Abstract
We propose many-body order parameters for bulk multipoles in crystalline systems, whenever the bulk multipole moments can be defined in terms of the nontrivial topology of the nested Wilson loop. The many-body order parameters are designed to measure multipolar charge distribution in a crystalline unit cell, and they match the localized corner charge originating from the multipoles when the symmetries quantizing the multipoles are protected. Our many-body order parameters provide a complementary view to the nested Wilson loop approaches and even go beyond, as our many-body order parameters are readily applicable to interacting quantum many-body systems. Furthermore, even when the symmetries quantizing multipoles are lost so that the nested Wilson loop spectrum does not exactly reproduce the physical multipole moments, our many-body order parameters faithfully measure the physical multipole moments, which is confirmed numerically during Thouless pumping processes. We provide analytic arguments and numerical demonstration of the order parameters for various higher-order insulators having bulk multipole moments. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our many-body order parameters in the cases where the Wannier gap is absent so that the bulk multiple moments cannot be defined in terms of the nested Wilson loop.
7 More
- Received 8 March 2019
- Revised 19 August 2019
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.245134
©2019 American Physical Society
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
- Research Areas
Density of statesEdge statesElectronic structureTopological materials
Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics
Authors & Affiliations
Byungmin Kang1, Ken Shiozaki2, and Gil Young Cho3,*
- 1School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea
- 2Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
- 3Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
- *gilyoungcho@postech.ac.kr
See Also
Difficulties in operator-based formulation of the bulk quadrupole moment
Seishiro Ono, Luka Trifunovic, and Haruki Watanabe
Phys. Rev. B 100, 245133 (2019)
Many-body electric multipole operators in extended systems
William A. Wheeler, Lucas K. Wagner, and Taylor L. Hughes
Phys. Rev. B 100, 245135 (2019)
Article Text (Subscription Required)
Click to Expand
References (Subscription Required)
Click to Expand
Issue
Vol. 100, Iss. 24 — 15 December 2019
Access Options
- Buy Article »
- Log in with individual APS Journal Account »
- Log in with a username/password provided by your institution »
- Get access through a U.S. public or high school library »
Article Available via CHORUS
Download Accepted Manuscript![Many-body order parameters for multipoles in solids (14) Many-body order parameters for multipoles in solids (14)](https://i0.wp.com/cdn.journals.aps.org/development/journals/images/author-services-placard.png)
Images
Figure 2
Interpretation of partition functions with the insertion of . acts at followed by the imaginary time evolution along . Periodic boundary condition is used along the direction.
Figure 3
(a)Corner charges of quadrupolar insulator derived from the effective action. Charges are localized only at four corners of the rectangular region , which has a nonzero quadrupole moment . Note that the vacuum has a trivial quadrupole moment . (b)Charge current configuration derived from the effective action under the Thouless pumping. In this case charges flow only along the boundary of , and their directions are denoted as arrows.
Figure 4
(a)The phase diagram of the quadrupole insulator (21) when and . The shaded region denotes topologically nontrivial phase (quadrupole moment equals 0.5), and black dots denote bulk energy gap closing points. (b)and (c)Evaluation of (2) for the quadrupole insulator (21). We set and , and evaluate (b)along the cut and (c)along the cut . In both cases there is a sharp change at , which is consistent with the phase diagram (a). (d)Anomalous topological quadrupole insulator [19]. Here the ground state is known to be topological if and trivial if , and this is well captured by . See the text for details on the model and the numerical values of the parameters.
Figure 5
(a)The complex phase of for topological octupole insulator (23). We set and tune . When (), the ground state is in a topological (trivial) octupole insulator phase, which is indeed captured by up to a finite-size effect. (b)Edge-localized polarization model (24) with and change . The corner charge comes solely from the boundary localized polarization, and the bulk quadrupole moment vanishes. We indeed see that the complex phase of is trivial up to finite-size effects.
Figure 6
Evaluation of the phase of of Eq.(19) and Eq.(20) for various values of in the case of (a)the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain (25) and (b)the quadrupole insulator (21). We set () and and change ().
Figure 7
Comparison between three different physical quantities, complex phase of , nested Wilson quadrupole moment , and corner charge for (a)isotropic Thouless pumping (27) and (b)anisotropic Thouless pumping (28). While the complex phase of and the corner charge agree with each other with almost no discernible differences, given in terms of the Wannier-sector polarizations agrees with the two only at , i.e., and the quadrupole moment is quantized.
Figure 8
(a)Tight-binding model of topological quadrupole insulator with -flux per unit cell. The tight-binding hopping parameters are shown with arrows, which specify the direction of the hopping. (b)Comparison between several different physical quantities, the many-body order parameter using with respect to the periodic and open boundary condition, the physical quadrupole moment via the bulk-boundary correspondence (26) , and corner charge during the Thouless pumping (29). We see a remarkable agreement between the many-body order parameter using under a periodic boundary condition and the physical quadrupole moment. The many-body order parameter using under an open boundary condition agrees with the corner charge up to a finite-size error. (c)The system size dependence of the many-body order parameter using under an open boundary condition at in Eq.(29) and the convergence to the corner charge in the thermodynamic limit.
Figure 9
Scaling of many-body order parameters versus the linear system size in the case of (a)SSH chain (C3) with and (b)topological quadrupole insulator (C5) with . (a)The modulus of converges to 1 as , as expected in the case of a gapped insulator. (b)The modulus of decays exponentially in even in the case of a gapped insulator.
Figure 10
Comparison between the Wannier gap and the modulus of for a topological quadrupole insulator (C4). In panels (a)and (b)we fix and tune . When (a)the Wannier gap closes and (b) is the smallest. In panels (c)and (d)we fix and tune . (c)The Wannier gap associated with the Wannier band closes at and (d) is the smallest around . In all cases the Wannier gap is well defined in the thermodynamic limit while vanishes in the thermodynamic limit.
Figure 11
Many-body order parameter based on applied to Eq.(C4) for various with while changing , which is the same as the cut used in Fig.4. The curve is identical for , and 11, showing that even when is an order of , the many-body order parameter based on correctly reproduces the phase diagram along the cut.
Figure 12
The complex phase of and for various as a function of . Panels (a)and (c)correspond to the SSH chain (C3) where we set and (c) and (d). Panels (b)and (d)correspond to the topological quadrupole insulator (C5) where we set and (c) and (d). While the ground state of panels (a)and (b)are topologically nontrivial, for some and , the complex phase of becomes trivial. In panels (c)and (d)as a function of , we see “lumps.”
Figure 13
(a) as a function of hopping parameter in Eq.(E1) with system sizes and . For , we take into account additional factor coming from background charge distribution. Note that both and show dependency in , while the fractional corner charge is independent of , hence indicating an unstable nature of the insulator with respect to . (b)The Wannier band of the ground state of Eq.(E1) at filling. We have one doubly degenerate and one nondegenerate flat bands, so in total zero net polarization.
Figure 14
(a) as a function of onsite -breaking parameter in Eq.(E5) with . Because of finite , the corner charge changes smoothly from a quantized value 0.5. Note that there is a mismatch between the corner charge and , showing an unstable nature of the -symmetric insulator with respect to . (b)The Wannier band of the ground state of Eq.(E5) with and and at filling. The Wannier band becomes gapless at .